1

I come across this in todays New Yorker:

Birkenstocks, like an iPad, or an eight-dollar bottle of cold-pressed juice, are the covetable answer to a need that hadn’t existed before they came along.

Isn't this just a past tense and shouldn't be written as: Didn't existed ? Would that be wrong?

StoneyB on hiatus
  • 173,630
  • 13
  • 257
  • 453
doubleE
  • 361
  • 2
  • 9
  • 18

2 Answers2

2

There isn't such a thing as "Didn't existed". Past tense would be: "Didn't exist".

Example: It didn't exist yesterday.

If something was done in the past before another event happened, then the correct form would be: "Hadn't existed"

Example: It hadn't existed before they came along. But then they came along and put it into existence.

:)

Setily
  • 268
  • 1
  • 5
1

The negative past tense it's made with didn't + base form, where the base form is the infinitive without to. The past perfect is used when an action or event happened before than other action in the past.

I was hungry because I hadn't eaten anything.

Schwale
  • 3,859
  • 2
  • 17
  • 38